Template:Did you know nominations/Titanic Belfast

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 12:40, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Titanic Belfast

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the new Titanic Belfast visitor attraction (pictured) tells the story of the ill-fated RMS Titanic through interactive videos, audio, replicas and displays?

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/RMS Titanic Maritime Memorial Act
• Comment: Expanded about 7.5x. Please hold for the Titanic centenary weekend on April 14/15.

Created/expanded by Prioryman (talk). Self nom at 22:04, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

• The overall length, and the level of expansion both check out fine, and the article is well referenced throughout, with no signs of plaguarism or close para-phrasing. However, I am concerned that a hook of this sort on the main page would be in contravention of WP:NOTADVERTISING: it does read like a short advert for the centre. Harrias ^talk 14:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

• I'm not sure I really agree with that; it's a statement of fact (that's what the place does, after all) and it's not as if it's saying "this place is great, come and visit". I'll ask for more views on the DYK talk page. Prioryman (talk) 20:17, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

• On re-visiting this, I think I was probably overly critical. While the line could be taken as a short advert, it is nevertheless written objectively and without trying to promote the attraction. Good to go. Harrias ^talk 10:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

• Great, thanks. Prioryman (talk) 10:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC)