Template:Did you know nominations/The Spy Chronicles
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Spy Chronicles
- ... that former ISI chief Lt Gen Asad Durrani was found guilty of violating Pakistan's military code of conduct for co-authoring a book with a former R&AW chief of India? Source: Army holds former ISI chief Asad Durrani guilty of violating military code of conduct (The Economic Times)
- ALT1:... that two intelligence chiefs of rival countries India and Pakistan co-authored a book in 2018. Source: The Washington Post
- ALT2:... that two spymasters of India and Pakistan have co-authored a book. Source: The Washington Post
- ALT3:... that Asad Durrani was not allowed to attend the book launch of his own book? Source: The Times of India
- ALT4: ... that former ISI chief Lt Gen Asad Durrani was found guilty of violating Pakistan's military code of conduct for co-authoring a book with a former chief of India's R&AW, ISI's rival?
Created by DiplomatTesterMan (talk). Co-nominated by DiplomatTesterMan and DBigXray 10:29, 3 March 2019 (UTC).
Date, size, neutrality, copyvio spot check, hook, are fine. But the article is very short, which is a shame. At the very least I'd ask the author to add a book infobox. It would also be nice, if not required, if the section on the resulting controversy would be expanded. The article implies, but does not go into any details, that the book was (is) controversial. It is kind of a shame to leave potential readers wanting to learn more about why this is the case. Please ping me here when the article has been expanded. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- I just want to write that I have read your comment and I will try to expand the article accordingly. But it may take a few days. (Will ping with the update accordingly once issues have been addressed). Thanks and regards. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: The article has been expanded to address the concerns raised above. Please check. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 08:56, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, much better and GTG now. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- User:Piotrus Thanks for your kind feedback to improve the article. Can you confirm which ALT have you approved. It will be helpful if you specify it below. regards. ALT4 a slight variation of ALT0 is my favourite. Either of the 2 can be selected. DBigXrayᗙ 04:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- All five hooks up to ALT4 are fine :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
