Template:Did you know nominations/Södermanland Runic Inscription 113
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Södermanland Runic Inscription 113
- ... that Södermanland Runic Inscription 113 (pictured) was found in 1856 when a burial mound was dug up as part of new cultivation? Source: https://sormlandsmuseum.se/globalassets/pdf-lista---rapporter/arkeologi/2013/13-stenkvista-kolunda.pdf - page 9. search for 1856. It's in Swedish. I'm so sorry.
- ALT1: ... that ...? Source:
- Reviewed: Anne Gunn
- Comment: I think that's the obvious hook. Trying to help out the International Museum Day celebrations at Sörmland Museum. Created by Adam Cuerden (talk). Self-nominated at 03:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC).
- Working on this on priority Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 05:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: IMHO Not must but you can include an image since seems available. Source is in Swedish language checked with Google translator, seems reasonably acceptable. It would be good to go live on May 18th as DYK author wishes. I hope/ request other users who know how to make it appear on May 18th will help out. Sorry It was my observation loss Image is already there. Cheers Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 05:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- The source is acceptable, and the article is sufficiently long. Nice work! Haiiya (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- My thanks to both of you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 20:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)