The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
2013 is being celebrated as the 150th birth anniversary of Swami Vivekananda. In September 1893 he delivered a series of lectures in the Parliament of the World's Religions in Chicago. Six of those lectures are mainly referred and recorded in the Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda. We are attempting to feature DYKs on the dates on which Vivekananda delivered his speeches in Chicago.
If "DYK featured?" column indicates "no", that means, the date is still free.
Please do not select more than 1 DYK per day (even if you see more than 1 DYK are nominated per day).
Do not comment on this template or the planned DYK celebration in the DYK nomination page. Post your comments here.
Task completed: 100% complete
DYK promoter/Admin, please note
If you feel a "passed" DYK nomination is not ready to be promoted or a hook needs to be pulled down from queue, please replace it with the immediate next DYK hook or select one from the reserved DYKs.
Article is new enough, long enough. I see some POV caused by a lack of attribution, such as "though this choice was not wrong and proved to be “absolutely breathtaking”." Work and publisher parameters seem to be mixed up in places. Don't see any close paraphrasing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello and thank you for starting the review. Here are the updates: a) I have removed the sentence b) there were an issue with a citation, India Today June 1998 citation was added twice, I added the URL with archived copy and Nvvchar added it once more. I have fixed it. c) I could not understand the "publisher" issue. --Tito☸Dutta 08:23, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Not saying it needed to be removed, but attributed. "According to (source), this choice was not wrong, but rather "absolutely breathtaking"." or the like (the "glaring omission" bit is another one). The publisher/work seems to have been with India Today, but double check to see if Hinduism Today, Rediff, etc. should be italicised or not. Also, curious about the poster: is that Sarvadaman D. Banerjee as Swami Vivekananda, or a picture of Vivekananda from the 1893 photo shoot? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
a) I have rewritten that "glaring omission" sentence, b_ newspaper names should be italicized— am I missing anything? c) yes, you are right, that is poster of the film depicting Sarvadaman Banerjee posing as Vivekananda --Tito☸Dutta 09:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Alright, this one looks ready to go. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)