Template:Did you know nominations/Sejm of the Estates

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:31, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Sejm of the Estates, Sejm of the Land

Created/expanded by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 21:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Sejm of the Estates: Size (5258 characters) and date (31 October) check out, AGF on offline and non-English sources. Great work, and good to go.--xanchester (t) 17:40, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Sejm of the Land: Size (4561 characters) and date (2 November) check out, AGF on offline and non-English sources. Looks good, but minor issue in the lead. It states "also known as was the parliament in the late 19th century Galicja region", but does not mention what the parliament was also known as.--xanchester (t) 17:10, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Another issue: Is "Constitution for the Galician province" the official title of the document? If so, it's a proper noun and province should be capitalised. If not, constitution shouldn't be capitalised, because it's used descriptively. However, if the definite article the precedes constitution, then constitution can be capitalised (like the Constitution when referring to the Constitution of the United States).This page is much better at explaining it than I am....--xanchester (t) 17:40, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Fixed lead (bad grammar), I capitalize Constitution per Jedruch. I don't know what was its official name, I added a red link because it's notable. Let me know if it looks fine now. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:17, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Looks ready to go now.--xanchester (t) 20:43, 8 November 2012 (UTC)