Template:Did you know nominations/Julia Sand
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 10:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Julia Sand
... that Julia Sand was a pen pal of U.S. President Chester A. Arthur?
Created by Futurist110 (talk). Self nominated at 23:57, 27 May 2013 (UTC).
Date, size, are fine. Primary concern involves no footnotes; there are some Harvard style citations without any hyperlinks (please see WP:CITE for how-to). Even if we were to accept dead-tree Harvard style (which I wouldn't be), the entire "Interpretation" section seems totally unreferenced. As such, this fails due to no references (but ping me on talk for a re-review if this is fixed in time). I'd also suggest a more interesting hook:- ALT1: ... that Julia Sand, a pen pal of U.S. President Chester A. Arthur, might have had significant impact on his presidency? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Please give me a couple of days and I will address all of your concerns. Thank you very much. Futurist110 (talk) 08:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- OK--I think that I fixed everything in this article by now. Futurist110 (talk) 08:09, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Please give me a couple of days and I will address all of your concerns. Thank you very much. Futurist110 (talk) 08:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
There are still some unreferenced paragraphs. I'll defer it to another reviewer, particularly as I proposed an alt hook. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- I approve of your alternate hook. As for the unreferenced paragraphs, let me fix them within the next couple of days. Futurist110 (talk) 00:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- OK--I think that I cited everything that I need to cite in this article by now. Futurist110 (talk) 00:31, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- I approve of your alternate hook. As for the unreferenced paragraphs, let me fix them within the next couple of days. Futurist110 (talk) 00:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- New reviewer needed to check issues previously raised plus the new ALT1 hook (less interesting original hook has been struck). BlueMoonset (talk) 00:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Seems to be fine, but lacks citations for the end of the Vist of Arthur section. I am willing to AGF on book sources.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I fixed what you told me to fix here. Is this article good to go right now? Futurist110 (talk) 00:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. The referencing issue has been fixed and the ALT1 hook is hereby approved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
