Template:Did you know nominations/Groom Mine
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Groom Mine
- ... that Groom Mine has a view over Area 51? Source: "The Unlikely Struggle Of The Family Whose Neighbor Is Area 51". ([1])
- ALT1:... that Groom Mine had been worked on by three generations of the same family? Source: "A Mine, the Military, and a Dry Lake: National Security and the Groom District, Lincoln County, Nevada" ([2])
- ALT2:... that in 2015 federal judge Miranda Du condemned the Groom Mine and transferred its ownership to the United States Government? Source: "Government takes family's land near Area 51" ([3])
- ALT3:... that fallout from nuclear testing fell on the Groom Mine during the 1950s? Source: The Size of the Risk: Histories of Multiple Use in the Great Basin. ([4])
- Reviewed: Stephen C. Ananian
- Comment: Article was moved from userdraft space on 14 March 2018, where it was worked on since 6 March. It has 7,607 characters of prose. All hooks are cited to sources which are used in the article. Nearly every sentence, if not all sentences, are verified to reliable sources. According to Earwig's Copyvio Detector, the closest this article gets to COPYVIO is 13%, that is largely due to usage of a quote in the Las Vegas Sun article from Col. Charles Meyer. All hooks are within 200 characters. No image is used in this nomination as I have not found any images of the mine itself that can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Reviewed the DYKN for Stephen C. Ananian.
Created by RightCowLeftCoast (talk). Self-nominated at 01:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC).
New enough, created day of nomination. More than 6 times long enough. Article written in a neutral manner. Article is replete with inline citations, every sentence has one. Earwig detected only direct quotes, and I found no close paraphrasing, copying in thought structure, or other copyright issues. The hooks are all within format, all accurate and directly tied to a citation found immediately after the claim in the article, and does not unduly reflect negatively on a living person. The hooks are all broadly interesting. QPQ complete, no DYK image to check. This is a well-written, interesting article that is ready for and deserves mainspace exposure. All hooks are approved, but I would recommend the original (ALT0) as most likely to generate interest. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:35, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
