Template:Did you know nominations/Citizens for Sanity

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Citizens for Sanity

Created by Elli (talk). Self-nominated at 19:06, 19 October 2022 (UTC).

  • I think, for a claim that controversial, I'd ask for a secondary source on the criticism itself. Howzabout we let the organization speak for itself? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 19:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
  • A note: This needs to run after the U.S. elections on November 8 (although, if i'm being honest, that's probably already how it's gonna shake out). theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 14:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
  • We won't have a delay problem now. The article is new enough and long enough, and QPQ is present. If you have watched sports in the last 30 days in the US, you have seen their inflammatory advertising—it's been impossible to ignore. (Non-US people perusing this DYK nom might note the high pageview count that balloons on Saturday and Sunday.) I am not sure how many of their claims are worth parroting on the Main Page, and I think Leek's hesitation about ALT0 is justified as well. ALT1 and 2 personally give me pause. My personal nod is ALT2a on punchiness and relatability. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 04:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)