Template:Did you know nominations/Churn Creek Protected Area

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by sstflyer 02:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Churn Creek Protected Area

Hills and benchlands in Churn Creek P.A.
Hills and benchlands in Churn Creek P.A.

5x expanded by The Interior (talk). Self-nominated at 17:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC).

  • The article is fully referenced, neutral and with no close paraphrasing. Hook is interesting & verified through online sources. QPQ pending but I'd take on good faith. Good to go to me! FrogmanOfTheSahara (talk) 01:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
  • This green-tick "Pass" is in doubt. It is part of a series of 15 (as of this posting) green-tick "Pass" done within minutes of each other several days in September. Please see WT:DYK. — Maile (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
  • New enough; expanded enough; neutral; no copyvio or any of that bad text jazz; hook hooky and cited (pity we couldn't have "hoodoos and twit twoos" but that would never make it out of the nom page); image free to use (a bit bland but I suppose that is the point); I left one cn tag in the article as the Gang isn't mentioned in the source; QPQ needed and then this will be good to go. Belle (talk) 23:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Hey Belle, thanks for the review. I've done my QPQ duty, also add the Parks page as a source for the Gang. I don't know what sound the flammulated owls make, could very well be a twit too :) The Interior (Talk) 01:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
  • I did miss them. QPQ done. The ref was required for the date of the Gang and the refer you added doesn't mention it (as far as I can see). I added another cite, but if you have a better one you could replace it. Good to go. Belle (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)