Template:Did you know nominations/Churchill caretaker ministry

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:43, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Churchill caretaker ministry

  • Reviewed: Exempt from QPQ (2 DYK credits) but have reviewed Tom Corbin

Improved to Good Article status by No Great Shaker (talk). Self-nominated at 21:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC).

  • Hi No Great Shaker, review follows: article promoted to GA on 8 September; article is of good length; Article is cited to reliable sources throughout; I don't have access to many of the sources but I checked those I could. I found one passage seems to be taken from this BBC source: "a new social order that would ensure better housing, free medical services and employment for all", that needs rewording; hooks are both interesting and mentioned in the article. The milk hook is cited offline and I am happy to AGF that it supports this, bacon checks out to the online source; QPQ checker confirms one is not required. If you can paraphrase the one passage then I think this is good to go - Dumelow (talk) 09:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Dumelow, and thanks for the review. I've revised that clause which now reads: "...so Labour's manifesto promised full employment, improved housing and the provision of free medical services". Please take a look and see if that's okay. All the best and keep safe. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks No Great Shaker, looks good to me now - Dumelow (talk) 10:59, 9 September 2020 (UTC)