Template:Did you know nominations/Avianca Flight 52

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Avianca Flight 52

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Wreckage of the aircraft

• ... that two surviving passengers of Avianca Flight 52 (aircraft pictured) were discovered to have swallowed condoms filled with cocaine?

• ALT1:... that the Boeing 707 flying Avianca Flight 52 (pictured) ran out of fuel and crashed onto a hill?
• Reviewed: Aquaveo

Improved to Good Article status by Veggies (talk) and SSTflyer (talk). Nominated by SSTflyer (talk) at 08:31, 15 March 2016 (UTC).

• (original hook)
• (ALT 1)

The article was promoted to GA on 14 March. No problems with copyvio/plagiarism as these are covered by GA process. Ref [16] does not support the claim, but refs [25][26] at the end of the paragraph do. I know that the DYK regulars are pretty hot on this sort of thing nowadays hence the question mark.

The NTSB report that references ALT 1 supports the fact, so no problem with using ALT 1. Mjroots (talk) 20:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

• @Mjroots: since close paraphrasing has been found in GA articles too, it's important to also check for it in DYK nominations. I've done a close paraphrasing check and removed one minor incidence of close paraphrasing. Yoninah (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

• I've trimmed "male" from the hook, as it adds nothing remarkable. Edwardx (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

• I don't see how ALT1 is hooky at all. The first hook is definitely hooky. If the sourcing isn't good, perhaps the nominator could suggest a different hook? Yoninah (talk) 22:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

• @Yoninah: I have added sources to support the first hook. Thanks, SSTflyer 03:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you! First hook is now verified and hook refs cited inline. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 18:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)