This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Writing about Indigenous people in past tense form.
It is not only inaccurate but also offensive to some Indigenous people, to talk/write about Indigenous people in past tense form as if they no longer exist. (unless of course, if they're extinct)
This article speaks in one sentence in present tense then in the next sentence in past tense. This happens most in the "clan system" section and the one following it.
If the culture has changed in relatively recent times then it is more accurate to use the terms "Traditional Culture" and "Post-Colonization Culture" or "Modern Culture" than it is to simply speak of a people in past tense terms.
NO IT IS NOT AN OFFENCE IT IS THE TRUTH OF GENOCIDE ALSO AGAINST VADUL ALAIS WHICH THEMSELVES COULD HAVE BEEN RED REFUGEES FROM THE CHARLES DE GAULLE ERA EXTERMINATION OF THE SURVIVING WOMEN KOK TURK PREHISTORIC OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Thank you to everyone that contributed to this article, it just needs tightened up a bit. SheaSandy (talk) 09:23, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
THE ODUL MAY HAVE ALL DIED FIGHTING FOR THE FAMINE EMPEROR WITH HIS GIGANTIC FAMINE PENANCES FOR FORNICATION UPON HIS POPULATION WHICH NEEDED MARX TO RISE UP AGAINST HIM AND LATER EXECUTED HIM FOR HIS HOPE TO RETURN TO POWER THE ODUL PRINCESSES MAY HAVE DIED OF INTIMATE AGGRESSIVE VIOLATION AND OF DYSTOCIA DUE TO SIZE DIFFERENCES
POSSIBLY THE CHURCH AS SURVIVING ATTEMPTED TO RESSURECT SOME
However they may also have died of post-even forced conversion to Christianity conversion with marriage to larger men of Western race.
The silent square of the official troops.
However Errata Humana est and possibly these men did not know what could happen.[reply]