Talk:Women's Voices Now

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Film festivals task force.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2019 and 10 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emfarone42. Peer reviewers: DavidNec.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re-creation

@DGG:, @Tokyogirl79:, @Kolokotch: I came across this organisation while editing No woman, thought it needed an article, found that there was an unsourced draft begun by Kolokotch which Tokyogirl79 had moved from mainspace after DGG PRODded it as "not really enough information to identify the subject". I think I've found enough about it now not just to "identify the subject" but, I hope, to meet notability. It seemed simpler just to create a new article from scratch as the draft was just two unsourced sentences, so I hope this was OK to do. There's scope to expand the article substantially from the sources I've found, especially the Peace Women interview. PamD 13:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PamD, It might well be notable but it does not yet really shown it. The interview a/ is not from a reliable news source, but an advocacy site and second is not a news interview but just an opportunity for the founder to say whatever she cares to say. The blog in he HP is not a RS. Everything else is heir own web site. VOA is the only actual RS for notability . But film festivals of al lsortss usually get good coverage, so there ought to be more. I'm not nominating for deletion, but I tagged it. DGG ( talk ) 13:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to echo DGG's concerns - I'm just not sure that this is really enough. Like him, I'm not going to nominate this for deletion or anything like that at this point in time, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Women's Voices Now

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Re-creation

Navigation menu

Search