Talk:Wimbledon Championships/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 20:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 6, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Fail. Has {{clarify}} and {{whom}} tags. There are many short, stubby paragraphs preventing the prose from flowing.

2. Factually accurate?: Fail. Much of the article is unreferenced. Many of the references that are there are unformatted, being raw urls.

3. Broad in coverage?:

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Pass

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.

Xtzou (Talk) 20:08, 6 June 2010 (UTC)