Talk:William Hoskins (inventor)

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Additional potential sources

The CHiC2 source identified the following offline sources:

  • Miles, Wyndham D., ed. American Chemists and Chemical Engineers. Washington: American Chemical Society, 1976. 231-232.
  • Marquis, Albert Nelson, ed. Who's Who in Chicago: The Book of Chicagoans. Chicago: A.N. Marquis and Company, 1931.

SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] 06:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More (not sure if URLs still valid):

 — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  10:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant 1901 lawsuit

Unresolved
 – Source not added to article yet.
[This thread was moved here from User talk:SMcCandlish.

See Hoskins v. Mathhes. Quite a lot of detailed information such as the full breakdown of the chemical formula used for their chalk, how they came up with the idea, prior similar compounds and more. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hot stuff! (Sorry, I forgot to comment on this when originally posted.) — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 08:55, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:William Hoskins (inventor)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 16:04, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I really like your way of reviewing an article and in-turn requesting for a review. Continuing that, here are few GA comments. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:04, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

Lee Vilenski – Everything seems good. Passing the article. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.