Talk:Willard Ryan/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 12:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • "has been given credit for being" -> "has been credited as being"
  • Might also be worth linking "head coach" appropriately for those of us outside US sport who aren't necessarily 100% familiar with that term.
  • "May 8, 1890[1] in" comma after year.
  • Lead says 10-1, infobox says 10-1-0. I'm not an expert, is it conventional to leave out the ties if they're zero? I would also be tempted to put some tooltips around that which describe "Wins–losses–ties" or similar, again for our non-US sports readers who aren't used to this method of presenting information.
  • "Packers under Ryan were more successful, with the team going 10–1" I get the "more successful" bit but it's feels like comparing apples with oranges, after all the other team only played six games. And it's unclear to me what the respective levels of those teams were.
  • "all roles that a head coach in modern football performs" ->"all roles performed by a head coach in modern football"
  • "he took part in Fourth Registration" took part but was he enlisted?
  • Joseph Merrill Hoeffel is mentioned in the head coach template but not anywhere here, which feels like an omission when Lambeau (who comes after Hoeffel is discussed in some detail.)

Brief review on a brief article, hope some of it is useful? Cheers. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 13:48, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks The Rambling Man! Always good feedback and appreciate the review. I think I got everything, let me know if you notice anything else. Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Gonzo fan2007, those changes look good to me, happy with the article as it stands now so promoting. Good work. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 07:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]