This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
This article seems like a marketing piece from WTB. There are no real outside sources, and nothing to indicate its place in the industry. What it needs is bonafide sourcing to indicate more complete information about the company. 842U (talk) 22:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is an abomination, and with sentences like "Photo used courtesy of Charlie Kelly’s Mountain Bike Hubsite." it is clearly copied and pasted from somewhere, but I can't find it online anywhere so can't just claim copyright violation. Would like to revert it back to this version anyway. -AndrewDressel (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Revert it to the last good version. The current version has many problems including WP:OR and WP:ESSAY issues.Dialectric (talk) 01:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Went back slightly farther to trim the section on TAM down to its bare essentials. -AndrewDressel (talk) 13:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
_pictogram.svg){kind=small}
_pictogram.svg)
