Talk:Wehrmacht forces for the Ardennes Offensive/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll have a full review up shortly. Terrakyte (talk) 13:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Preliminary review

I'll first start by checking the article against the quick-fail criteria:

  1. The article completely lacks reliable sources. NA
  2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way. NA
  3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including {{cleanup}}, {{wikify}}, {{NPOV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{fact}}, {{clarifyme}}, or similar tags. NA
  4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars. NA
  5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint. NA

I believe the article passes the quick-fail criteria. I'll conduct the full review now. Terrakyte (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Full review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    I think this article is very good. I can't think of anything to suggest to improve the article atm. If I do, I will let you know. Well done. Terrakyte (talk) 14:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]