Talk:Vapalux
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in the United Kingdom may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Dear People,
I am in the midst of writing a good article about the Vapalux Pressure lamp. I put a draft up too quick I'm afraid. It is not complete nor finished. I am working on it, it is not a spam or sneeky way for making advertisement. Please give me a couple of days to complete and alter it to be good enough for Wikipedia.
Bart J. Meijer 23:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Bart J. Meijer
Well yes this was a mistimed/accidental contribution, and can I point out that Vapalux is an important part of British history that was wholly usurped by the more popular/inferior Tilley Lamp. The Vapalux really deserves a page.
Skeeves 23:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks... upon review it's pretty interesting to learn about these paraffin lamps. I removed the CSD tag replacing it with a Cleanup tag. Please continue to edit the article so that it conforms to Wikipedia's standards and that it is neutral in tone (see WP:NPOV). I'll help out with the first paragraph. JRHorse 00:10, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for the compliments and the help. We are working on the last section that can be added. On the mean time, some more edits have been done, and we are working on yet another set of articles.
With regards, Bart J. Meijer 00:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Bart J. Meijer
- Thanks also we've made some changes learning fast I think? we have no affiliation with this company, just a great love for pressure lamps and lanterns Skeeves 00:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)