This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
@Snickers2686: Just as we add confirmed but not commissioned judges to the table, I think when a judge assumes senior status "pending the confirmation of their successor", it seems logical (to me at least) that we can indicate when a judge will assume senior status imminently. Indeed, less than 4 hours after you reverted my edit, you personally made the same edit. I don't know why that was necessary. Nevermore27 (talk) 18:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Nevermore27: Because at that point it hadn't been acknowledged by the FJC yet, which has always been the controlling factor when updating when judges receive commission or go senior. Per WP:CRYSTAL: Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place.Snickers2686 (talk) 18:20, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Snickers2686: We currently do beg. 2021 for judges confirmed but not commissioned, I don't see much difference between that and using -2021 for a judge who is imminently assuming senior status, as your edit less than 4 hours later demonstrates. So maybe we should stop doing the former. Nevermore27 (talk) 18:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Nevermore27: Well the judge will more than likely take office the same year they're confirmed, albeit one who may be confirmed in late December but commissioned in January, (i.e. Morgan Christen, Don Willett, etc.) but those are rare exceptions.
Yes, but Boardman couldn't receive her commission until Bennett vacated the seat. Nevermore27 (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
