Talk:United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1761

Suggestions for improvement

It's a good stub article, but here's some ideas how the article can be improved upon:

• List which countries voted for or against the Resolution … as well as which countries abstained.
• The effects of the Resolution -- did any of the Member Nations actually break ties with South Africa?
• Excerpts of speeches made in favor of (and in opposition to) the Resolution -- which countries' ambassadors made them?

I could probably find the vote tally, but I'm not sure how to format a two-column list depicting which countries voted for or against the Resolution (three columns, I suppose, if the abstentions are to be included as well). --Micahbrwn 02:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1761. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070607210339/http://www.anc.org.za:80/ancdocs/history/aam/dissertation.htm to http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/history/aam/dissertation.htm
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070509010117/http://www.anc.org.za:80/ancdocs/history/aam/symposium.html to http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/history/aam/symposium.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Bottom reference to stubs obsolete?

At the bottom section two references are made to so-called stubs. My impression is that both referenced articles are currently sufficient in length and depth. I propose to remove the subs part of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daalbhaat (talk • contribs) 09:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)