Talk:Tueller Drill

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Firearms Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Sandel, William L.; Martaindale, M. Hunter; Blair, J. Pete (2021). "A scientific examination of the 21-foot rule". Police Practice and Research. 22 (3): 1314–1329. doi:10.1080/15614263.2020.1772785. S2CID 219765729.

Disagree

I disagree with the 'citation needed' here. The article appeals to common sense in "One would think", "Should be", and "has a dilemma". What sort of citations could cover this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.151.119 (talk) 07:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In popular culture: season 5 of "Justified"?

Would it be worth mentioning that season 5 of Justified make several indirect references to this as the "21-foot rule"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.65.211.107 (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A scientific examination of the 21-foot rule

A scientific examination of the 21-foot rule https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15614263.2020.1772785 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:CDA0:1060:398D:8970:4140:43B4 (talk) 12:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mythbuster

Assuming all other things being equal and correct, the Mythbusters reference should either be removed entirely or more pragmatically expanded to include the fact that the drill requires two center-of-mast shots. One shot at absolute point blank range (the attacker being close enough to grab the gun themselves) is a diffrent test, and therefore a diffrent result. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.10.163.44 (talk) 01:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blah

Topic is very deserving of inclusion, I can say as someone who got shafted by the cops. This article, however, is POV cop trash and in need of a complete rewrite. 76.70.97.144 (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]