Talk:Tropical Depression Five-E (2008)/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. I made a few copy edits which you are free to revert if I changed the meaning. Everything looks good. There are just a few issues.

Comments
  • There are some dead links.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/ep05/ep052008.public.a.003.shtml?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/ep05/ep052008.public.a.004.shtml?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/ep05/ep052008.public.a.006.shtml?
  • What is "Hill of Ortega, Cabbage" as I have never heard of it?

Everything else looks good. Nicely written!

—Mattisse (Talk) 22:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "Hill of Ortega, Cabbage" was lost in translation. I also fixed those dead links. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

—Mattisse (Talk) 23:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks hink, I got the last reference then :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Netrual
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass

Congratulations. Good work!

—Mattisse (Talk) 00:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Tropical_Depression_Five-E_(2008)/GA1"