Talk:Triangular bipyramid

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Polyhedra Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polyhedra, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of polygons, polyhedra, and other polytopes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolyhedraWikipedia:WikiProject PolyhedraTemplate:WikiProject PolyhedraPolyhedra articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Untitled section

59.88.114.15 17:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Bhaswanth::::---------> Actually the diagram showing what a triangular bipyramid is the correct one. But the graphic representation of it which is at the last line of the article, is not the actual correct representaion of it. It has for the two(2) pyramids base as a square but it must contain a another triangle for its base.[reply]

Inconsistency?

Second sentence of article: It is the dual of the triangular prism with 6 isosceles triangle faces...

In section Dual polyhedron: The dual polyhedron of the triangular bipyramid is the triangular prism, with five faces: two parallel equilateral triangles linked by a chain of three rectangles.

Looks like first sentence is wrong. Jumpow (talk) 20:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WTF images?

The images in this article of the triangular bipyramid are seriously awful. They had me thinking for a good hour that this was some kind of weird configuration of points and not intuitive at all. And then I look up images of it anywhere else and it's just an equilateral triangle with two opposite points. Cstanford.math (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Triangular bipyramid

Untitled section

Inconsistency?

WTF images?

Navigation menu

Search