Talk:Todd Alquist

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Lack of notability

I was initially inclined to nominate this article for deletion, as a minor character from the show is not particularly notable enough to warrant an article. The complete lack of sources and accusations (in the edit history) of copy/paste from Wikia do not help the case for this article either. But perhaps, with enough sourcing, there might be enough worthwhile material to keep it. If anyone can find some sourcing for it, that would be a good start. DP76764 (Talk) 01:18, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Todd gets his own article but not Mike?

No offense, but there really isn't much to say on Todd. He serves his purpose well, but other than (maybe) a couple interactions with Lydia, he is never the focus: he is always relayed to a second plane. There is some minor analysis to who he is, but given his little screentime, he doesn't even get a "character development" section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.190.31.21 (talk) 05:09, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Todd Alquist

Lack of notability

Todd gets his own article but not Mike?

Navigation menu

Search