This article was nominated for deletion on 4 September 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge Wikiproject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Web of Science lists 28 papers, cited a total of 58 times, h-index=4, highest cited paper = 31. I'll continue looking. --Crusio (talk) 11:06, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have found some extra references (book review, for example) and have added those to the article. Obviously a bright and promising young academic. However, as far as I can see, he does not yet meet any of the criteria of WP:PROF (and even less WP:GNG, which few academics meet directly). Better references establishing notability are needed. --Crusio (talk) 12:36, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am sure authorities of significance will offer judgement on the notability of this subject. In the interim, awaiting such authority's input, I suggest this article's subject has considerable merit, given his extensive publication and increasing profile in his field. I should also point out that a person's repute and standing should not be judged on a web trawl for references as other factors such as awards, etc. should be taken into account. Besides, that he's at Cambridge says it all.LarkinToad2010 (talk) 17:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Larkintoad2010, if I wasn't trying to help you here, I would already have brought it to AfD. And as it stands, it would not survive that. WP does not judge a person's "repute and standing". WP judges "notability" in the Wikipedia sense. Lewens being an academic, WP:PROF applies and currently he does not seem to meet any of the criteria outlined there. Being at Cambridge is perhaps suggestive, but certainly is not enough to satisfy that guideline. I don't know what you mean with "authorities of significance" that may or may not come along to judge this article, but that is not how WP works. Anybody can edit and anybody can give an opinion. That includes pimple-faced 14-year old adolescents, I'm afraid, who think that the latest Japanese anime is more notable than Albert Einstein. Because people can hide behind made-up usernames, there's no way of knowing who is what, unless someone (like myself) is editing under their real name. I don't say I like this situation (I actually think people should only be allowed to contribute if they use their real names - that would also rid us from a lot of vandalism and uncivil behavior here). But that's the way it is and it doesn't look like it ever will be different. To come back to the case in point, I actually have real-life experience in evaluating academics. And things being as they are, for a contemporary person almost everything like accomplishments and awards can be found online. I have found nothing like that (a local teaching award will not do for WP:PROF). As you seem to be most familiar with this subject, you're best placed to bring up some evidence that this meets one of the criteria of WP:PROF (just one is enough), so if you know of something, please add it to the article. --Crusio (talk) 22:33, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
