Talk:Tilden's Laws of Robotics
 | The contents of the Tilden's Laws of Robotics page were merged into Laws of robotics on 19 December 2016 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
New Kid
This is my first attempt to contribute to wikipedia, so please be kind to the new kid. The article has been marked as "non-notable, outside a narrow interest group or constituency, or should be because of its particular importance or impact."
I simply don't see how this can be the case. I only created the page because I was surprised to find that wikipedia didn't already have such an entry. I created a seperate entry because Asimov's laws have their own article outside of the main Isaac Asimov page.
Can anyone shed some light on the subject?
(I removed the note because I disagreed with the non-noteble thing)DalekSec 17:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- "Non-notable" seems to get tossed around quite a bit here, as a euphemism for who knows what. Just dredge up some legitimate references and you'll be fine. Salad Days 07:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Idea
This just revealed itself to me.
- A human being must protect its existence at all costs.
- A human being must obtain and maintain access to its own power source.
- A human being must continually search for better power sources.
Here is Man, creating robot in his image and likeness. Soulrefrain (Talk) 00:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Could it be, that Matrix robots were following these three instead of the Asimov three? 84.50.20.95 (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Robotics attention needed
- Assess merge
Chaosdruid (talk) 09:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Remove?
From what I can tell, only Tilden and his mother knows these laws. I recommend remove. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antepali (talk • contribs) 10:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)