Talk:Tetrasomy X/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JackFromReedsburg (talk · contribs) 03:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello I will be reviewing this article. As usual, comments will be made soon. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 03:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

General comments

• All claims are cited
• All images are sourced properly
• It would be better if this article had more images, but the ones currently are minimally sufficient for GA.
• Earwig copyvio report came back clean.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

• This article meets all basic criteria, so I will be promoting it. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 04:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)