Talk:Tampa, Florida/Archive 3

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 12 external links on Tampa, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

 A section of the article has the correct name for Tampa which would be Ten-pa or a "river in the sky" which describes lightning.  Accurate using the Ojibway language.     Book --America rising sun.  Donanasazi (talk) 21:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Tampa, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

"Tampa, FLA" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tampa, FLA. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 6#Tampa, FLA until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. I'm not perfect but I'm almost (talk) 05:50, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2021

There is more recent metro population data available from the US Census. Change 3,068,511 to 3,097,859. Source link: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?text=population&g=310M500US45300&tid=ACSDT5Y2019.B01003&hidePreview=false The TableID is B01003. From 2019 instead of 2016. Have a lovely day! Blob401 (talk) 17:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC) Blob401 (talk) 17:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done - Donald Albury 23:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Tampa, Florida

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Tampa, Florida's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "USCensusEst2020":

  • From Buffalo, New York: "QuickFacts: Buffalo city, New York". Retrieved 2021-08-17.
  • From Baton Rouge metropolitan area: "County Population Totals and Components of Change: 2010-2020". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved July 30, 2021.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 05:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Fixed. Donald Albury 14:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 1 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Early WP:SNOW close. As noted below, this proposal goes against WP:USPLACE and has no chance of succeeding at this time. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 12:38, 6 November 2021 (UTC)


Tampa, FloridaTampa – Tampa is a major city that cannot be confused with any other city. The convention for major US cities has been to not include the name of the state they are in. San Diego, for instance, is the name of a major US city, but is also the name of various minor cities around the world, but the Wikipedia article of the major US city is simply "San Diego". AndyrooP (talk) 03:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.