Talk:Takahashi method

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What's this supposed to mean, "much fewer words are used rather than sentences?" --Belg4mit 04:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some edit suggestions:

  • The Korean poster is confusing, why Korean and why portrait when the creator is Japanese and the presentation (probably) landscape? Maybe specify that Takahashi is indeed Japanese (it is alluded to but not clearly stated.)
  • From my interpretation the goal of the style is to minimize distraction and focus the audience on thinking and listening. The current page doesn't explain "Why" Takahashi method, only What and maybe How.
  • Also, "never used PowerPoint" is open ended, what did he use instead? Although most people holding talks on conferences are decent devs, using PowerPoint to make the Takahashi presentation is actually good advice (in my opinion). Prevents you from wasting time hacking your computer trying to get sent to work, and it is easy to fall back on features you already know. (maybe add PowerPoint/Google Slides to external links to make clear they are fully capable of making Takahashi presentations.)
  • Lastly, I think I found Takahashi's github: https://github.com/takahashim (though I am not sure it is really him.)

I am new to wikipedia editing so won't do any decisions myself. Uneven-sunflower (talk) 21:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Links to the presentation?

Is this the RubyConf presentation that's mentioned in the article https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVr5nBAaJb4 ? (doubt it) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.110.191.153 (talk) 12:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, Takahashi's first rubyconf presentation was much older than that, I think maybe 2002. None of the presentations from those conferences were recorded (Confreaks started filming ruby conferences in 2007; prior to that I think there may be some audio recordings, but as far as I know none from as far back as 2002). 2600:1700:7A20:10DF:4623:F047:7DFE:4FD7 (talk) 00:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]