Talk:Synthetic diamond/FA1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FA Review
- Nominator(s): Materialscientist (talk) 03:27, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured article NIMSoffice (talk) 03:27, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|
Unresolved issues
- "they will be able to sustain the increased intensities of next generation light sources." Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Perhaps "they may be used in the next generation of light sources to sustain higher intensities" or some such.
- Sure. Replaced. Materialscientist (talk) 00:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- "synthetic diamond may be used in the next generation of light sources to sustain higher intensities of next generation light sources" A tad redundant, yes? --Cryptic C62 · Talk 01:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh dear, not the redundancy - the whole text is in the wrong section. I have moved it to another one (optical).
- "synthetic diamond may be used in the next generation of light sources to sustain higher intensities of next generation light sources" A tad redundant, yes? --Cryptic C62 · Talk 01:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sure. Replaced. Materialscientist (talk) 00:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- The table in the Gemstones section seems unnecessary and promotional. I suggest removing it.
- I nearly deleted it twice myself, and was just waiting for someone to suggest that.
- "The mined diamond industry is evaluating marketing and distribution countermeasures to these less expensive alternatives." It isn't clear what "these" refers to, as the previous sentence doesn't seem relevant to this one.
- Tweaked.
- "The three largest distributors of natural diamonds have made public statements about selling their diamonds with full disclosure" Full disclosure of what?
- Tweaked. Could you please check my last changes and give a green light for FA nomination when ready. Whatever the article grading, you have done a lot to that (and are entitled to claim that as your contribution). Thank you indeed. Materialscientist (talk) 03:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- "they will be able to sustain the increased intensities of next generation light sources." Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Perhaps "they may be used in the next generation of light sources to sustain higher intensities" or some such.
- That should be it! --Cryptic C62 · Talk 03:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Everything looks good to me. Start up the FAC, and I'd be happy to add my support !vote. Great work, mate. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 03:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)