Talk:Subah
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Requested move 31 January 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 21:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Subah (country subdivision) → Subah – As per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. – Filpro (talk) 05:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Filpro: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Page Subah is already a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose fails the "Subah was" test in GBooks, there is no one topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Obvious primary topic. Wikipedia page view counter seems to be down, but this is clearly primary over a 1987 TV show and a character from a kid's show that is barely mentioned in the article, and these are the only two ambiguous topics. Subah province gets 8k+ Google Books hits, compared to 884 for Subah television.--Cúchullain t/c 21:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- The new page view counter shows that the Subah (country subdivision) is indeed the primary topic in use.--Cúchullain t/c 16:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Support I don't have any issue with the article the way it is, but I think it might take some precedent of a tv show in the old days. Alexis Ivanov (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. "Subah" is also an archaic misnomer for the governor of a subah, i.e. a subahdar, and this is now addressed in the two articles. — AjaxSmack 04:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.