Talk:Sticky & Sweet Tour (album)/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Adabow(complain) 05:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is very close to GA standard, with just the referencing of certifications stopping it from passing. I have also mentioned some minor prose problems, but if they are not fixed the article will still pass GA. I will allow seven days for improvements to be made.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


Prose

  • "...promotional campaign for the release, giving an autographed DVD..." maybe giving away?
Good. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:55, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Critical reception' section: "Mikael Wood from Entertainment Weekly gave the video a B+ and commented, "[T]his live CD-DVD", per MOS:QUOTE, the 'T' in 'This' doesn't need to be enclosed in square brackets
  • 'Chart performance': the position of the charting of the Blu-Ray release should be included
  • I was referring to the prose section
  • New Zealand Album chart[[Recording Industry Association of New Zealand|New Zealand Albums Chart]]
Leave it to me Adabow(complain) 05:59, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Track listing' section: maybe rename as plural (Track listings), given the several listings
  • Instead of breaking up the different listings with level three headers, why not include them as the headline parameter in the {{tracklist}} template? The multiple headers also clog up the ToC
I'm not exactly familiar with the jargon, can you show me one? I'll do the rest. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:55, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sure

References

  • The Greek and Mexican certs are not in refs
They are, check MX and GR in the album flags. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:47, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what refs you're talking about, but the refs cited are [1] and [2] Adabow(complain) 06:05, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh crap, I thought you were talking about the album peak reference. I'll check it and if not present, I'll remove it. --Legolas (talk2me) 06:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, all good
Hey I corrected it. And thanks for correcting the TRacklisting section. Appreciated. --Legolas (talk2me) 06:18, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Charts': for charts that use the Hung Medien archive (those with ref 26), please use the individual pages for each country. You can find these by clicking on the flag of each country
It's not major, it just displays more relevant information for that country. It is also common in WP articles, including some you have worked on, such as The Fame. Adabow(complain) 05:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, Iworked on The Fame so long ago. Nowadays all the album and single articles I develop I use a single combined reference. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:47, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]