Talk:Stephen Swad
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
Perhaps this gentelemen should take resposibility for what is going on now He like so many other tycoons that have never shown that they gave a damn about their shareholders yet still have benefited from the demise of their company and others. I beleive this gentleman will rot in hell one hopes that his children wont follow the same example. (the cause of our dilema now) 24.126.221.176 (talk) 02:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Kmc2112
I firmly disagree with your point, the economy brought the house market down, having nothing to do with this gentlemen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dswad (talk • contribs) 22:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Is it relevant ?
It seems to be extracted from his curriculum vitae. Why anybody should be interested to this guy ? Did he do something peculiar enough to change the society? I guess he wrote it himself to improve his web image and land in a better job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.22.203.78 (talk) 23:36, 13 December 2014 (UTC)