Talk:Star Wars Episode I: Obi-Wan's Adventures

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleStar Wars Episode I: Obi-Wan's Adventures has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 13, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 22, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the video game Obi-Wan's Adventures chronicles the events of the film Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, but from the perspective of Obi-Wan Kenobi?

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Star Wars Episode I: Obi-Wan's Adventures/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --Hadger 18:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC) I (Hadger) am requesting someone else to review this, because I think it may need expansion, so I wouldn't really be good at reviewing it.[reply]

Secondary comments

I know I beat the initial reviewer, but I wanted to point out a few things:

  • The plot is still rather thin. Are there no text-based cutscenes or anything else to help flesh it out? Given that its a Star Wars game there should be enough of a plot to warrant its own section. I realize its a GBA game, but a two paragraph plot should be a minimum. I like the inclusion of a link to The Phantom Menace's plot, but don't be afraid to repeat parts of that plot if their specific to the game. If the game really doesn't have anything to drive plot-wise that's fine, but if there's anything that can expand the plot that would help passing GAN much easier.
  • Per WP:PLOTSUM the plot itself does not need to be sourced from external sources. External sources help, but are not necessary. Don't worry about sourcing it if you can't, just expand it, and source what you can externally. --Teancum (talk) 01:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Secondary opinion: Teancum (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I would really be the type who reviews this article because it should be expanded. You can review it if you want. --Hadger 21:11, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. You can review it if you want to. Thanks, by the way! :) --Hadger 22:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

Plot

Gameplay

  • There are a total of nine levels in it: "Trade Federation Landing Craft", "Naboo Swamp", "Naboo Swamp and Sacred Place", "Coruscant", "Catacombs of Theed", "Streets of Theed", "Queen Amidala's Palace", and "The Final Battle". needs to be removed entirely per WP:GAMETRIVIA. A list of levels simply isn't encyclopedic.
  • It needs to mention that the player controls Obi-Wan, even though its obvious (as the game might allow for one-off controlling of other characters)
  • to control his lightsaber and blaster should not mention gender. Change his to their

Reception

-Teancum (talk) 16:37, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. I think I have addressed them all. :) Theleftorium 18:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PASS --Teancum (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Star Wars Episode I: Obi-Wan's Adventures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]