Talk:Snakehips (duo)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Snakehips (duo) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 23 March 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 19:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
– Only subject which is just "Snakehips". Unreal7 (talk) 20:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose both people are just "Snakehips" the formulation of their article names is different from usage in the world. -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 04:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose – the rationale presented does not justify or compensate the additional ambiguity that this move would cause. Precision is good. Dicklyon (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support WP:PTOPIC per page views. SSTflyer 09:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Misplaced template Unreal7 you have done it again; RMs moving a disambiguation page must start with the disambiguation page, not from one page. This avoids project alerts and watch weighting one article. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- In ictu oculi, that's not true. If anything, it's generally preferable to put the article first over the dab page, to make sure its watchers will see the RM.--Cúchullain t/c 14:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- And oppose completely fails Google Books test In ictu oculi (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. Although the band currently predominates in the page views,[1] I don't see them as overriding the historical significance of the dance, the two people called Snakehips, and all other topics combined. The band is new so there's probably a fair amount of WP:RECENTISM driving up its numbers.--Cúchullain t/c 14:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.