Talk:Simon & Schuster
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Simon & Schuster article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
What's with the terms of use violation tag?
I don't know what this is all about. The only thing relating to the tag is when it was put there by Domdeparis after being edited by a digital marketer. Can someone explain? --NowIsntItTime 20:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi the undeclared paid editor tag was added because the page has been edited by an undeclared paid editor for other articles so it is legitimate to presume that he was editing this one for money too. This editor has now disappeared probably to create another account to avoid scrutiny. This tag is a way of alerting that the page's content may not be of the required standards of neutrality. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:42, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oh ok. Thank you. --NowIsntItTime 00:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- So this article, on a significant publishing company, and which has existed on Wikipedia for over 14 years, is now excluded from Google and other search results, even though no-one has identified a single specific thing wrong with it. *applause* Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:39, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- The editor was hired by a spinoff from Simon and Schuster to create a promotional article and edited this article in consequence. Another editor has removed the relevent material from what I can see but maybe didn't realise they could remove the tag too. Done. Interesting the bit about it being removed form Google though because when I searched google a link to the WP page was listed above the company page. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:46, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- So this article, on a significant publishing company, and which has existed on Wikipedia for over 14 years, is now excluded from Google and other search results, even though no-one has identified a single specific thing wrong with it. *applause* Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:39, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
I just ordered a internet password book from them. it's great. They printed it on the same day I ordered it. Are they the same as S&S Publishing? Haleymiranda1979 (talk) 23:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
"Start Publishing" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Start Publishing has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 16 § Start Publishing until a consensus is reached. Pichpich (talk) 18:17, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Publishing of IP that they don't own
When discovered of an IP that is published threw a company of writen words and charater that is not owned by them. How should one percede after? 2600:1700:A167:B810:F1BA:E075:5A93:47DA (talk) 09:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)