This article was nominated for deletion on 24 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Tagged for notability and need for a complete rewrite
Thanks for adding the full rewrite tag. I guess that means the topic is important enough. --Uncle Ed (talk) 06:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What part of "The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic. If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted" did you fail to comprehend? No, this does not mean that "the topic is important enough", and ladling on more citations to Grossbard-Shechtman herself will do nothing whatsoever to improve this. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 07:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Msrasnw, thanks for adding some details. I hope it's enough to prevent deletion of this article. Some contributors feel that a "stub" needs to developed to a certain point (viability?) or else it should not exist at all. Others, such as myself, feel that with a cooperative effort, a small article can quickly and easily be made viable. The question is whether prod and AfD should be used to stimulate this process; and also whether misuse of prod and AfD could discourage contributors from volunteering. --Uncle Ed (talk) 17:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your thanks. I can't see how this can fail in an Afd now. But I have been wrong before. Such Afds can be a useful spur to action but they still seem to me not the right way to go with the Afds perhaps using up more time than the article. As a side issue I have added little articles on the journal and on the economics of marriage which seem potentially useful. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 17:10, 25 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]
.svg){kind=small}