This article was nominated for deletion on 26 September 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Page has been replaced with information that satisfies the criteria for inclusion. Please notify why this should not be so.
Comment, I don't see how this meets WP:BIO criteria, but it is sourced now, so I've reinstated the importance tag, but removed the unverified tag. If you feel it meets WP:BIO, please indicate which criteria it meets. I also reformatted the references to conform to standards and removed an unsourced statement (which I have no objection to you adding back in if you have a source for it).--Isotope2316:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see from the article's AfD that everyone had a problem with the article's sources and the notability of the subject. I also have a problem with those two things and I note that the article hasent improved much over the last 2 years. Look at the respondents in the previous AfD, everyone said "weak keep" or "weak keep with extra weak", not exactly singing praise there. Bonewah (talk) 14:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
