Talk:Shades of cyan

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus, so not moved. An identical (or at least massively overlapping) set of articles has been listed for discussion in at least 4 separate locations: Talk:Variations of brown, Talk:Variations of cyan, Talk:Variations of pink, Talk:Variations of gray.
Listing the same articles in multiple locations is totally contary to WP:MULTI, and disrupts consensus formation by fragmenting discussion.
I am therefore closing all 4 discussions as "no consensus", without prejudice to an immediate renomination of the same set in one location. Guidance on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting_multiple_page_moves, and I will be happy to help doing that if asked on my talk page. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Variations of cyan → Shades of cyan – All relevant articles should be unified as per as per discussion.

Most follow currently the "Shades of …" naming scheme anyway, so change the remaining "Variations of …".

Shades of white: leave unchanged
Variations of gray: move to => Shades of gray
Shades of black: leave unchanged
Shades of red: leave unchanged
Shades of green: leave unchanged
Shades of blue: leave unchanged
Variations of cyan: move to => Shades of cyan
Variations of pink: move to => Shades of pink
Shades of violet: leave unchanged
Shades of yellow: leave unchanged
Shades of orange: leave unchanged
Variations of brown: move to => Shades of brown Tony Mach (talk) 11:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support all for consistency, and because "shades" more clearly relates to colors. bd2412 T 17:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support all per my comments at Variations of pink. PaleAqua (talk) 10:49, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Note that the lead of most of these articles state tints and shades, and infact links to the artice Tints and shades too. IE, shouldn't these be Tints and shades of brown, etc? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 20:55, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Variations of brown which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closed supporting the "Shades of" version. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 18:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Aero blue

As part of an initiative to prune entries in List of colors: A–F, List of colors: G–M, and List of colors: N–Z, one entry I reviewed, "Aero blue" is linked to this page. While this page has an entry, the associated "source" is simply the word "sharpie". I tried poking around a bit but I have not found a proper citation for the existence of this color or its attributes. My hope is someone can do some research to find a better link.--S Philbrick (Talk) 17:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal from list

Entries in List of colors: A–F contained links to this page.

The entries are :

Cyan azure
Cyan-blue azure
Cyan cobalt blue
Cyan cornflower blue
Deep green-cyan turquoise
Desaturated cyan
Green-cyan

I don't see any evidence that these colors are discussed in this article and I plan to delete them from the list per this discussion: Talk:List_of_colors#New_approach_to_review_of_entries

If someone decides that these colors should have a section in this article and it is added, I would appreciate a ping.--S Philbrick (Talk) 15:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AuroMetalSaurus

The color AuroMetalSaurus was recently added to this page in revision 873386334 by User:Drdpw and cites two websites that both seem to just aggregate color names (Arteqo and Encycolorpedia). It does not appear in any dictionaries (not even Urban Dictionary) and I'm having trouble finding any references to it that make it clear it wasn't just made up by this edit. If the history of this color is known it should be added to the description of that section, which is currently extremely sparse. Otherwise it seems appropriate to remove it from this page. Altay8 (talk) 22:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Shades of cyan

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Shades of cyan's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ISCC-NBS":

From Spring green: "ISCC-NBS". Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
From Shades of pink: "Ca through Cz". ISCC-NBS Dictionary of Colo(u)r Names. John C. Foster and Texas Precancel Club. 1955. color sample #26. Archived from the original on July 30, 2017. Retrieved September 22, 2010. The ISCC-NBS Dictionary of Color Names is a color dictionary used by stamp collectors to identify the colors of stamps.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]