Talk:Secondary consciousness

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher-order thought?

Is this connected to David M. Rosenthal (philosopher)'s ideas of higher-order thoughts? Fences&Windows 21:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edelman's theory

"Despite being an often criticized theory, Edelman’s theory of consciousness is regarded as the most neurobiologically sound and accurate description of consciousness to date."

This is a strong claim. The Consciousness page mentions Edelman's theories alongside many others. Consciousness studies is a controversial field. I can't find any evidence of consensus here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MvwYUym3 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Secondary consciousness

Higher-order thought?

Edelman's theory

Navigation menu

Search