Talk:Sanand

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Economy information

The info about tax exemption is written like an advert in some ways. Does this need rewriting, or is it ok as it is (apart from some questionable syntax and grammar)?

QuickClown (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrally presented financial and economic policies are part of encyclopedic info. It becomes an ad only if it urges one particular viewpoint or a sale. In case of Sanand, the information presented is NPOV and verifiable - it can be useful to those who oppose tax exemption and such economic policies; it can be useful to those who support or seek such economic policies; it can be useful to those who wish information on policies that might be attracting auto companies; it can be useful to those who seek to compare economic policies of Sanand with, say auto hubs in China; etc. etc. Slant isn't and shouldn't be in the text. Slant, if any, is in the mind of the reader.
On the need to fix the article's syntax and grammar, I concur. ApostleVonColorado (talk) 00:04, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sanand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]