Talk:Sam Chui

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Unreliable source tag

Medium blogs [1] are generally not reliable sources per WP:SPS. Additionally, while most of the other citations are major publications, the actual coverage of Chui therein is pretty minimal, to the point that this article doesn't clearly meet WP:GNG as written (although I did come across additional paywalled coverage such as [2] that looks better). signed, Rosguill talk 17:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is Sam married?

Is Sam married? 203.221.227.242 (talk) 08:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for a friend?(Just like a hopeful grandmother) WurmWoodeT 01:58, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Chui Criticism

I have found at least 2 Airline Reviewers that have criticised Sam for his work and staging reviews:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf4_unp0c2Q&t=2s & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVk5wsoVn7Q&t=

Hence it's absolutely legitimate to include these in the bio. There are many online discussions as well about his reviews being PR pieces sponsored by the airline with many airline employees backing these up. 112.134.140.165 (talk) 06:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These are his competitors mentioning him without factual proofs inside the video.
On Sam's YouTube channel, he actually stated sponsorship are declared upfront (at the beginning of the video the sponsorship flag is on) and there are no breach of any policies.
Sam also mentioned on his website (https://samchui.com/about-sam-chui/) that he write to airline in advance for filming permission so the airline is aware of his filming. 50.158.133.239 (talk) 18:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A clear case of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest since Sam Chui himself has ordered the changes (see editing history by User: Leohasaewaccount who admitted that he is editing on behalf of Sam Chui) breaching Wikipedia guidelines.
The two individuals don't seem like competition since they don't promote airlines in return of compensation but acting in their role as independent journalists exposing Sam's work which makes a legit reference. 112.134.137.189 (talk) 18:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]