This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Edinburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EdinburghWikipedia:WikiProject EdinburghTemplate:WikiProject EdinburghEdinburgh articles
The proposal to delete this page seems wrong. This Society has had a significant place in Scottish life over a period of more than half a century. People will sometimes want to know about it, and this page provides a basic pointer. Notability really shouldn't be an issue. The quality of the article is an issue, since this is only the stubbiest stub, but I cannot offer to do more as I have no information myself. But even as it stands it seems better than nothing. --Doric Loon 05:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but you should try to find some sources. try Google and google books as a start. DGG (talk) 05:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless, material copied from the society's website is likely to be overly promotional in tone for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 13:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since the article existed before any material from that source was added, deletion of the whole article is in any case not the way to go. --Doric Loon (talk) 21:39, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
