Talk:Sachet

title

The title is now Sachet (scented bag). That is true but sachets are really any small porous bag, used for a wide variety of purposes. The title should really be "Sachet (porous bag)". Pkgx (talk) 15:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

This sentence in the lead is true and important "A sachet is also a small porous bag or packet containing a material intended to interact with its atmosphere; for example, desiccants are usually packed in sachets which are then placed in larger packages." The article itself is mostly just about those scented sachets. Would be great if someone could make it clear that the term "sachet" could be either. A disambiguation page could be the solution? EMsmile (talk) 22:48, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Usual BS

Get used to it - most people know a sachet as a small metal-lined bag for powders and liquids, mostly proprietary medicines and sauces like ketchup, salad cream, mayonnaise, etc.. The type of sachet you discuss may well be the original use of the word, but it sure as hell ain't the only one. But it's so politically correct and worthy, it almost makes me want to puke. Maelli (talk) 17:17, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

The citations list is longer than the article itself

Does one line really need 35 citations? --Molotovnight (talk) 22:17, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

• Yes there are excessive citations. Most of them are not in the complete format required by Wikipedia. I have started to clean out some of these. Pkgx (talk) 23:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)