Talk:Royal family order

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Swedish Family Orders

The section about Swedish Family Order is highly speculative. The division into grades or classes does not appear in any sources I have read. Also, the Royal Cypher worn by Alice Trolle-Wachtmeister has no relation to the Portrait Badge. It is a version of the badge worn by Ladies in Waiting. /Elzo 90 (talk) 13:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also; they're not officially Royal Family Orders, but 'merely' portraits of the reigning monarch, granted as a mark of personal esteem by the said monarch.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 11:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Royal family orders has been nominated for discussion

Category:Royal family orders, which is the current parent category of this article, has been nominated for upmerging to Category:Orders, decorations, and medals. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus for what a better title would be. (non-admin closure) — Dicklyon (talk) 04:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Royal Family Order → Female royal order – "Family order" seems to be mostly a British term and this would describe the actual content better to lay readers around the globe. I'm open to other name changes but, whatever we go with, we should standardize the capitalization. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • No -- The target should be Royal Family Orders. The article lists a series of orders granted to British and Scandinavian monarchs, mostly (though not necessarily) to women. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Question @Peterkingiron: The article begins with "TheRoyal Family Order is an order awarded by the sovereign of a monarchy to female members of the royal family..." (emphasis mine). Is that statement accurate? (That's an honest question; the article is so poorly sourced entirely with blogs that I don't take anything it says for granted.) RevelationDirect (talk) 12:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • You seem to be right about it being entirely female. Some of the British links are to a Royal family site, where I cannot find any clear statement, but I still support my alternative target. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Family Order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Family Order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:45, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal family order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After the wearer's death?

Since they are ringed with diamonds, I am curious: what becomes of them after the wearer's death? Are they passed down in the family? returned to the Crown? J S Ayer (talk) 03:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Dutch wikipedia

i wrote an article on these orders, including the one Prussian example and the numerous Tsarist Russian portraits of the souvereign, surrounded by diamonds and worn by men and women, usually suspended from the ribbon of a high Russian order. There were a lot of illustrations, many of Russian generals and statesman. And there were sources. the article was removed... i was punished. After all, someone anonoumusly wrote, "anyone could paste a picture from a newspaper and wear it on his breast..." the article "portrait in diamonds (decoration)" was deemed a fantasy or even fraudulent.

Robert Prummel 2001:1C01:3B06:1900:5C54:1ACA:11BD:6F6E (talk) 18:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Royal_family_order"