Talk:Romidepsin
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Romidepsin.
|
 | A fact from Romidepsin appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
patent expiry
US patent 4,977,138 expires Jul 6, 2012 - Rod57 (talk) 11:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Structure
The molecular structure shown in the line drawing is incorrect. There is a carbon atom missing between the sulfur atom and the peptide backbone.66.235.28.149 (talk) 23:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- structure still wrong (There is a carbon atom missing between the sulfur atom and the peptide backbone) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.163.254.158 (talk) 00:19, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Can we describe the structure, eg as a cyclic depsipeptide of 4 residues with a thio or disulphide bridge hence making it a bicyclic peptide ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
There is an additional error: In the literature the double bond is reported to be cis (methyl to nitrogen), here it is shown to be trans! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4CA0:2615:1:F530:7DF6:6499:925C (talk) 08:45, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Even one more error in the structure: The centered double bond is supposed to be trans, not cis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4CA0:2615:1:FD6C:FF1C:6614:A9FF (talk) 07:14, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
ATC Code
The ATC code is L01XX39 http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/?code=L01XX39&showdescription=yes. I would add it but I don't want to screw up the format of the table. Sorry about that. Eiad77 (talk) 15:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)