Talk:Road to Germany/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: warrior4321 18:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Overall, it's not bad. There are a few issues which need to be fixed. They have been issued below, please address them.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Although, you should try to look for some free or fair use images of the director or producer.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Please address the issues mentioned below, and I will gladly pass the article.


In-Depth Comments

Prose

  • There is a doesn't in the article. It should be changed to does not.
done--Pedro J. the rookie 02:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

  • Why are there paragraphs with such a low amount of text? Create one or two strong paragraphs.
done--Pedro J. the rookie 02:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, it hasn't. Put all of the information into one paragraph, perhaps?

Production and cultural references

  • Why not make this into a list form with bullets?
Its not the best way to make an artical(been tought me that)--Pedro J. the rookie 02:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • After reading the script aloud, Jewish executive producer David A. Goodman said, "I'm going to get kicked out of my temple".
One line paragraphs are not proper prose. Increase the sentences in the paragraph or sack the line.
Done--Pedro J. the rookie 03:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • All of the facts in this section need references.
Eliminated OR--Pedro J. the rookie 02:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Syndication Cuts

  • Either expand this section or cut it from the article
Done--Pedro J. the rookie 02:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

  • All references are working, however more references would be appreciated

Disambiguation links

  • No issues here

Images

  • More images should be looked up, perhaps on the director or producer? Please remember they have to be free or fair use.
Done--Pedro J. the rookie 02:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you want to prepare for FA criteria, alt text should be added
DOne--Pedro J. the rookie 02:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is the new image added fair use or free use? It seems like a copyright violation to me.
Removed--Pedro J. the rookie 03:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The lead had not been fixed as I asked. However, fixing it myself and seeing all other issues addressed, I pass this article to GA quality. warrior4321 04:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]