Talk:Regression validation

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Statistics High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Untitled

This is a poor article. It has nothing at all about estimating the model's ability to predict out of sample, the most important part of any validation and applicable to any type of model. Residual analysis only provides a test of the model's assumptions. Ideally an independent dataset should be used to test the model's predictions. The mean square error of prediction (MSEP) is the commonly used measure of fit to the new data. The PRESS statistic is an attempt to estimate the MSEP without independent data using the leave-one-out cross-validation technique and is given by most regression software. All good textbooks describe these measures. Galltywenallt (talk) 11:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The opening of this article gives not citations and yet appears to be just a loose plagiarisation of the source at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pmd/section4/pmd44.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.129.70 (talk) 23:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think there was a note claiming This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. I have added a link under references. (Msrasnw (talk) 10:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Talk:Regression validation

Untitled

Navigation menu

Search