Talk:Refractory

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Refractory From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about heat resistance. For other uses, see Refractory (disambiguation). Refractory is the quality of a material to retain its strength at high temperatures. Refractory materials are used to make crucibles and linings for furnaces, kilns and incinerators. There is no clearly established boundary between refractory and non-refractory materials, though a practical requirement often cited is the ability of the material to withstand temperatures above 1100 °C without softening.

RANDOM UPPERCASE HEADINGS

This looks officious and is not particularly concordant with Wikipedia's style guidelines and /kinda/ needs to get fixed before this can count as a real article.Koyae (talk) 12:15, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refractory materials

[edit] Refractory materials Main article: Refractory metals Refractory materials must be strong at high temperatures, resistant to thermal shock, chemically inert, and have low thermal conductivities and coefficients of expansion.

The oxides of silicon (silica), aluminum (alumina), magnesium (magnesia), and calcium (lime) are the most important refractory materials, though fireclay (an aluminosilicate of varying composition) is widely used as well. Zirconia is used when the material must withstand extremely high temperatures. Silicon carbide is another refractory material. It is very strong at high temperatures, but will burn in the presence of oxygen, if the protective silica coating comes off. Refractories must be chosen according to the conditions they will face. For example, carbon cannot be used when it will be in contact with oxygen, as it will burn.


[edit] Types of refractories Acidic refractories cannot be used in a basic environment and basic refractories cannot be used in acidic environment because they will be corroded. Zircon, fireclay and silica are acidic, dolomite and magnesite are basic and alumina, chromite, silicon carbide, carbon and mullite are neutral. Refractory metals are also frequently used.


[edit] Refractory Anchorage Anti-abrasion refractory attached to pipes, chambers, etc, will require anchorage systems such as wire formed anchors or formed metal to support the refractory linings.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractory"

All she wrote?

Having been a lifetime reader of encyclopedias, I'm often impressed with Wikipedia articles for the detail they provide. For example, the summary of the novel "The Dosadi Experiment" is wonderful, as is the article on Mortification of the Flesh. This article, however, seems far too sparse. It also seems to contain inaccuracies. For example, where did the idea originate that calcia and magnesia are the two most important refractories? Aluminosilicates are far more widely used - they're the basis of most firebrick, all insulating firebrick (IFB), and nearly all ceramic wool materials. Next to aluminosilicates, the most important refractory materials would have to be alumina and silica separately. Magnesia and calcia are way down on the list.

Considering that refractories are necessary in the manufacture of practically everything our society depends on, including our steel, aluminum, glass, and petroleum, I should think a more expansive and detailed article would be indicated. Cumbre 14:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I work for a brick factory building corporation. In addition to not being a distinction between the temperature at which something becomes categorized as a refractory, here, some materials are refractory (such as the hard pressed kiln car surface blocks, made from cordierite, Mullite, and alumina..) but the fiber insulation blankets are by some not considered to be a "refractory" due to its soft nature, or something? As a ceramic engineer with many years in industry, I classify all ceramics as refractory, but, the ones used as insulation or kiln wall and car materials to be "refractories". Also, having supported the steel industry over the years, The handling equipment (those big buckets, lids, pouring chutes, etc)I consider as refractories, but, the steel parts that work only a lifting function, using regular materials are not refractory, but, if the material were selected to handle the heat, I would say it to be "refractory". So, I guess I consider materials that are selected for their application to handle the temperature of the evironment, and perform a function to be refractory materials, although they may not be considered "refractories". Steels(metals), carbon(organic), ceramics (inorganic-
The above entry appears to be cut off from a longer entry. Perhaps an editor can add back the missing part.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 22:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Refractory diseases

Should there be a mention of refractory diseases and/or a cross-link to the entry on disease? A refractory disease is one that resists treatment, so there appears to be some common etymology —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dllahr (talkcontribs) 17:49, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added an entry for it at Refractory (disambiguation). Wizard191 (talk) 14:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical composition contradiction

The entries for acidic and neutral refractory materials seem to contradict each other. Alumina is listed as being both "easily affected by basic materials" and "chemically stable to both acids and bases" in the first two sections. I know these are matters of degree, not of kind, but it still shouldn't be in both sections. Does anyone have a source on acid/base stability of refractories? Kajabla (talk) 13:27, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic definition

I don't like the definition introduced in diff/840371238 by Abmcdonald. I think that it is incorrect to refer to minerals only, because materials may be composite, i.e. composed of multiple minerals. The mention of resistance to pressure and chemical attack seems problematic as well: Although these properties may be desired, the defining property is the resistance to heat. Petr Matas 04:06, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]